![]() ![]() ![]() Therefore, the camera will either massively blow out colours if artificial lighting is present (making the night sky an unnatural shade of blue), or will pick up hardly any details at all if little light is present. Firstly, there isn’t a dedicated night mode. I wouldn’t recommend using the A14 in extremely low light conditions. However, whilst some details are not as crisp on this mode, it is still better than what I’ve seen from other smartphone cameras at this price range. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. Smartphones with Mediatek Helio G80 processor List of smartphones that works with Mediatek Helio G80 processor inside. On the opposite end of the spectrum, the wide-angle lens seems to give everything more of a pale tone. We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1330 (with Mali G68 MP2 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G80 (Mali-G52 MP2). This is decent for landscape photos, but anything past that (the A14 can do all the way up to x10 zoom) produces a lot of blur and noise. For example, when I took a photo underneath an orange parasol, the whole image got a very warm tinge to it that wasn’t true to life.įor close-up shots, I wouldn’t recommend using anything more than x2 zoom. 0.The image processing seems to overcompensate a lot, whacking up the brightness of colours to the point that it looks like you have a filter on. Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets. #16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.078s. In terms of Graphics, MediaTek Helio G80 has Mali-G52 MP2 GPU and Bifrost architecture and latter Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G comes up with Adreno 618 GPU and Adreno 600 architecture. ![]() #15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s. The comparison refers to MediaTek Helio G80 processor featured in Redmi 9.The dimension and weight comparison. ![]() #14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.055s. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. #11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11886 +0.007s. We compared the 8-core MediaTek Helio G80 (Mali-G52 MP2) with the older 4-core Helio A22 (PowerVR GE8300) SoC. #9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15065 +0.002s. #7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12221 +0.009s. #4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16:04:04 +0200 +0.001s. MediaTek Helio G Series The core of an incredible gaming experience Watch Video Through wide-ranging platform enhancements, we make every millisecond matter, ensuring there's no barrier to you dominating the field. Why is MediaTek Helio G80 better than the average CPU speed 2 x 2GHz & 6 x 1.8GHz 11.78GHz RAM speed 1800MHz 1655.26MHz Semiconductor size 12nm 18.44. 4, Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL, LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4-1200 / LPDDR4x-1600 Memory Controller, 1080p30 H.264 Video Encoder, H.264 / H.265 1080p30 DecoderĤx ARM Cortex-A75, 4x ARM Cortex-A55, LPDDR4x-1866 Dual Channel, UFS 2.1, LTE Cat-12 DL/ Cat-13 UL, Wi-Fi 5, BT 5.0 We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 850 (with Mali-G52 MP1 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G80 (Mali-G52 MP2). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |